The WyBlog - Latest Comments

Re: Six years of WyBlog? Holy cow!

Chris Wysocki — Fri, 24 May 2013 14:53:17 -0000

You betcha!

Re: Six years of WyBlog? Holy cow!

TheBigHenry — Fri, 24 May 2013 11:40:32 -0000

Congrats, Chris. Effem if they can't take a joke!

Re: Six years of WyBlog? Holy cow!

Chris Wysocki — Fri, 24 May 2013 10:16:06 -0000

Thanks Adrienne!

Re: Six years of WyBlog? Holy cow!

Adrienne — Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:54 -0000

Happy Blogoversary, Chris! Wishing for many more years of your wit and wisdom...

Re: Another Obamacare gotcha: To sign up you need a checking account

TheBigHenry — Thu, 23 May 2013 20:18:03 -0000

Free lunch is so yesterday. Today there's free healthcare, free Obama-phones, free gasoline and mortgage payments from Dear Leader, and, of course, a free checking account.

Re: Teen invents supercapacitor cell phone charger, but can it store 1.21 gigawatts?

TheBigHenry — Thu, 23 May 2013 20:11:26 -0000

More likely too old ...

Re: Another Obamacare gotcha: To sign up you need a checking account

Chris Wysocki — Wed, 22 May 2013 17:04:03 -0000

Fees? Life is full of "fees." Those pre-paid Visa cards come with an upfront fee, don't they?

Checking accounts used to be "free." You got charged if you bounced a check. Then the Democrats decided people who were too lazy to balance their checkbooks needed "protecting" from "predatory" banks. So no more overdraft fees. The bank's gotta make money somewhere. Nobody gives away stuff for free (unless he's Barack Obama). Paying $6 a month to use a bank isn't unreasonable. And with a small minimum balance most banks waive that fee.

But OK, suppose you really can't afford that 6 bucks. Tell me, how the hell are you going to afford health insurance premiums? Or are you expecting someone to give that to you for "free" too?

Re: Another Obamacare gotcha: To sign up you need a checking account

Ferd Berfel — Wed, 22 May 2013 16:56:16 -0000

Yes, getting a checking account is easy; paying the $6 monthly fee is not. If you have a fairly static balance in your account, the $6 a month will eat through it in no time. Have the banks provide free checking accounts and the problem goes away, minimum balances notwithstanding.

Re: Obama's FCC plans to allow more sex, profanity, and nudity on prime-time TV

PAttyconservatopia — Tue, 21 May 2013 17:00:39 -0000

#24 of "Naked Communist..45 Declared goals" Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
The leftists have been tirelessly working to undermine our society, values, & country.

Re: Teen invents supercapacitor cell phone charger, but can it store 1.21 gigawatts?

disqus_d5WzHWkQWH — Tue, 21 May 2013 15:30:09 -0000

...anyhow in just two short years we'll have flying cars and won't need roads. 88MPH will seem slow. I can't wait!

Re: Teen invents supercapacitor cell phone charger, but can it store 1.21 gigawatts?

disqus_d5WzHWkQWH — Tue, 21 May 2013 15:25:54 -0000

Proof, that is really easy to prove.
What the movie didn't show is that they started the time machine within the time-machine, so what you were seeing in the movie was an exact duplicate of what occured after several trial-and-error tries. The Doc was too smart to rely on chance. Remember when they were still at the mall and the dog Einstein went ahead one minute in time? There's your proof, Proof. Once again, science-fiction is made into fact!
The real mystery to me is where did those terrorists get that big bazooka rocket launcher?

(I think TheBigHenry may be too young for BTTF)

Re: Teen invents supercapacitor cell phone charger, but can it store 1.21 gigawatts?

TheBigHenry — Tue, 21 May 2013 12:33:31 -0000

What?

Re: Teen invents supercapacitor cell phone charger, but can it store 1.21 gigawatts?

Proof — Tue, 21 May 2013 11:33:41 -0000

It always fascinated me how a car driving 88 MPH could arrive at the courthouse the exact second lightning struck it, based on the minute the clock stopped.

Re: Connecting the dots: Obama -> IRS Union Chief -> Tea Party harassment

Chris Wysocki — Mon, 20 May 2013 16:10:01 -0000

If only Cryin' John would grow a pair....

Re: Connecting the dots: Obama -> IRS Union Chief -> Tea Party harassment

Liberty At'Stake — Mon, 20 May 2013 13:46:07 -0000

I do believe Ms. Kelley just earned herself a subpoena from the Congressional Select Committee On Executive Branch Abuse of Power. Oh, wait a minute, Speaker Establishment hasn't had the imagination to create that yet.

Re: New media spin: IRS should have targeted big GOP groups like Karl Rove and Koch Brothers

John Carey — Sun, 19 May 2013 19:48:09 -0000

Unbelievable! Once again the lamestream media carry Obama's baggage. I don't trust them one bit.

Re: "Forward" to Tyranny: Obama promotes IRS Tea Party inquisitor to Obamacare enforcer

Liberty At'Stake — Fri, 17 May 2013 15:57:16 -0000

Wow. That's the first picture of her I've seen. You can tell she is a soulless bureau-weenie and Progressive statist thug through a blindfold. Team Leftie has been giving us a lot of good poster children lately.

Re: Yes, Obama's IRS is the Enforcement Wing of the Democratic Party

Glenda Sellers Burke — Fri, 17 May 2013 01:48:58 -0000

Yep, VJ runs the place. Kinda looks like the IRS has been co-opted as a 'Civilian Army' of sorts.
When I heard the list of Organizations that had been targeted ... it was reminiscent of the DHS list of people to look out for as potential terrorists. Remember that?

Re: David Garrard "retires" from the Jets, paving the way for Mark Sanchez to keep his job

Chris Wysocki — Thu, 16 May 2013 16:03:32 -0000

I would like to see McElroy get his shot. He subbed adequately for Sanchez, and unfortunately flubbed the following week due to inadequate prep time. He's got a good arm though, which is something Sanchez will never have.

Re: David Garrard "retires" from the Jets, paving the way for Mark Sanchez to keep his job

Liberty At'Stake — Thu, 16 May 2013 15:59:30 -0000

I say trade Sanchez for whatever he can bring in 2014 draft picks, and make it a McElroy / Smith competition in the pre-season. Those two conference championship berths were earned with team defense.

Re: Obama's IRS: Intimidating Republican Supporters

Zak Thomas-Akoo — Wed, 15 May 2013 15:21:17 -0000

I know you (like me) don't normally like reading things you disagree with, but still I think you might find this a good read, if only to say exactly why it is wrong http://www.nybooks.com/article...

Re: Obama's IRS: Intimidating Republican Supporters

Terry_Jim — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:59:39 -0000

I read that years ago, discipline problems in high school were talking and fum chewing, now assault & vandalism are common problems.
When you read the Articles of Nixon's Impeachment, you get that same nostalgic feeling

Re: Kermit Gosnell is guilty, but did the jury say abortion equals murder?

disqus_d5WzHWkQWH — Tue, 14 May 2013 13:44:33 -0000

What this 'doctor' did was just horrible.

But one thing that is not brought too much up are the pregnant mothers and THEIR responsibility. How could a mother abort a child that is obviously kicking-around in her womb? The mother's that want abortions so late in their pregnancy should be brought up on charges also. When you have a living person in your body, it is no longer about the 'health of the mother'. It's a person and should be treated as such. This is what happens when there's generation upon generation of children having children. You can't tell me that, as a mother, you don't know when a child is 'viable'. Horrible lack of maturity, to say the least. It is just uncivilized.

Re: Remember when Hillary Clinton was fired from the Watergate Committee staff?

formwiz — Mon, 13 May 2013 16:22:57 -0000

No, Choom and da Chicago boyz make Nixon look virtuous. We should stop calling this an Administration and call it what it is - The Choom Gang.

This is a criminal enterprise wire-to-wire and he is the most dishonest President in history.

(and that include the Articles of Confederation)

Re: Remember when Hillary Clinton was fired from the Watergate Committee staff?

Proof — Mon, 13 May 2013 00:28:51 -0000

When you consider the magnitude of the lies they've both told, one wonders if the truth will be more damaging to Hillary than to Obama?