<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The WyBlog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-6b6e2c91" type="application/json"/><link>http://wyblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://wyblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:38:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529876196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's got to be replaced right? Unelectable now... who can step in? Hillary? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FakeDrudge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529651428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What makes you think I have a problem with the pictures you post? I'm just holding you to the same doctrine that you use to judge other people. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:34:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529592761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell me my boob-o-phobic friend, did last week's Time magazine cover give you the vapors? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:21:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529543894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Chris, that means a lot coming from you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know the McGreevy comment was sarcasm. And the Marcus Bachamnn comment was.....Lets move on. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure that Father Z would say the same things to you about the pictures of giant boobed women you're always posting on your site. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529531906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Curt, you're so predictably tedious. Bless your little heart.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The McGreevey comment was *sarcasm*. Surely you've heard of sarcasm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for "unnatural marriage," I'll let Father Z &lt;a href="http://wdtprs.com/blog/2012/05/theologians-against-bishops-on-unnatural-sex/" rel="nofollow"&gt;explain it to you&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529492564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Add in blowback from Black churches and the once-vaunted Obama electoral machine seems dangerously close to coming off the rails."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't place all of your chips on that hand if I were you. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"...doubled down on unnatural marriage,"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Explain to me how gay marriage is "unnatural" when homosexuality if found in over 200 different species in nature???&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"calling for repeal of DOMA"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because it is blatantly unconstitutional. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"he'll probably dump Joe Biden in  favor of Jim "I am a Gay American" McGreevey. Hey, once you go gay, you may  as well go all the way!"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not according to Marcus Bachmann's "clinic". &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529449509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, to quote Glenn Reynolds again, "don't get cocky kid."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TSA, keeping us safe from Henry Kissinger</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/terrorism/keeping-us-safe-from-henry-kissinger.html#comment-529447879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, only in Liberal-ville are Ho Chi Minh, Mao, Che, Fidel, Stalin, et al heroes of the proletariat while the one man who did more than anyone to counter communism and advance the cause of freedom is a "war criminal."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Obama goes gay, more states are in play</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/o-goes-gay-more-states-in-play.html#comment-529425125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's way too early to predict what will happen in November. As my grandmother used to put it, "Between then and now, a Pope will be born." &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CFL</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TSA, keeping us safe from Henry Kissinger</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/terrorism/keeping-us-safe-from-henry-kissinger.html#comment-529422707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It must have been all the years HK spent associating with known terrorist organizations (e.g. the North Vietnamese) that landed him on some TSA watch list. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CFL</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TSA, keeping us safe from Henry Kissinger</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/terrorism/keeping-us-safe-from-henry-kissinger.html#comment-529408117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair, the guy is a war criminal. He may not be a danger to white America, but he sure is/was to the rest of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yumtacos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Jersey&amp;#39;s government-subsidized solar energy &amp;quot;market&amp;quot; needs more subsidies</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/agw/nj-solar-needs-more-subsidies.html#comment-529238006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I assume you're also in favor of repealing all the oil and gas specific *taxes* government collects? Let's start with "windfall profits" taxes, and work our way down to each state's gasoline tax.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Jersey&amp;#39;s government-subsidized solar energy &amp;quot;market&amp;quot; needs more subsidies</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/agw/nj-solar-needs-more-subsidies.html#comment-529143606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And let gasoline compete. No subsidies for oil companies. No demands on government to control gasoline prices. No special exceptions to laws. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In humor there is truth, here&amp;#39;s a great joke from today&amp;#39;s church bulletin</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/in-humor-there-is-truth.html#comment-528881067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except for the past 50 years the American Catholic Church has by and large aligned itself with lefty-liberal-progressive politics. Benedict XVI is changing that, for the better. First on the chopping block - &lt;a href="http://wdtprs.com/blog/?s=magisterium+of+nuns" rel="nofollow"&gt;the Magisterium Of Nuns&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:52:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In humor there is truth, here&amp;#39;s a great joke from today&amp;#39;s church bulletin</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/in-humor-there-is-truth.html#comment-528452840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't say "sadly". I'm no church apologist, but in my opinion one of the things the Catholic Church has going for it is its, well, umm... "catholic" perspective. Explicitly aligning itself with a political ideology would undercut the church's moral authority. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kicking off National Offend A Feminist Week - feminuts kick boy off girls field hockey team</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/no-boys-in-field-hockey.html#comment-528246828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a Catholic we know that women cannot nor will they ever be priests.  It's a dogma of the faith.  It ain't gonna happen.  Yet there are those women who insist on trying to change the game so to speak.  They are literally banging their butch hair cut heads against a brick wall. They want to be priests.  It's more about them and their opinion of what constitutes equality than it does in serving God and his people.  With that being said I have yet to know or meet one single man who wants to be a nun.  Go figure. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cassie Wonderalke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:07:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In humor there is truth, here&amp;#39;s a great joke from today&amp;#39;s church bulletin</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/in-humor-there-is-truth.html#comment-528022221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um, the punchline to that joke is "Hi Mitt." But sadly, your version has some truth to it too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 15:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mothers Day needs more mothers</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/mothers-day-needs-mothers.html#comment-527973650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder what evidence you have that atheists don't breed. I did. Twice (so far as I know). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In humor there is truth, here&amp;#39;s a great joke from today&amp;#39;s church bulletin</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/in-humor-there-is-truth.html#comment-527972311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another great joke I heard recently was:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A conservative, a moderate, and a liberal walk into a bar. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the bartender says....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hello Your Eminence. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:04:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mothers Day needs more mothers</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/mothers-day-needs-mothers.html#comment-527941276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Demographics old boy, demographics. All those new mosques aren't full of atheists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fastest growing religion among former Christians is atheism. Among Muslims, it's Islam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Atheists don't breed, Muslims do. Vociferously.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Wysocki</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 13:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In humor there is truth, here&amp;#39;s a great joke from today&amp;#39;s church bulletin</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/in-humor-there-is-truth.html#comment-527919407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perfect - since I just got through perusing the Facebook page of a typical greenie-weenie, Obama loving, social justice advocate, dissident Jesuit priest at Gonzaga U in Spokane (which is completely off the rails.)    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While there I was able to witness many of my former religious education students soaking up this trash.  It is truly a tragedy.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrienne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mothers Day needs more mothers</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/mothers-day-needs-mothers.html#comment-527872497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fastest growing religion today is no religion at all. I'm curious how that video would know that all those new babies are "Muslim" babies. Is religion genetic? If so, where are all the atheists coming from? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 10:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Justice is blind, and so is the Second Amendment: Blind man can keep his guns</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/news/2nd-amendment-is-blind.html#comment-527381359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's great! I Love my gun!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MF2G_P1GQ8c" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Star_titan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NJ state test requires 3rd graders to disclose their deepest secret</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/education/njask-3rd-graders-deepest-secret.html#comment-527286030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess they need to find exploitable weaknesses in people.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MattRoss</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:51:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Butane fuel cell gadget puts two weeks of smartphone charging in your pocket</title><link>http://wyblog.us/blog/tech/smartphone-fuel-cell-pocket-charger.html#comment-527241148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, so far as you go @Cube , but consider this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hummer: 2000 Wh/mi&lt;br&gt;Camary: 1000 Wh/mi&lt;br&gt;Prius: 300 Wh/mi&lt;br&gt;Elite: 80 Wh/mi&lt;br&gt;Schwinn: 10 Wh/mi&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, it should be noted that liquid H2 (not the car, the molecule) has near 1000 Wh/oz -- three times the energy density of fossil fuel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My point being, yes, liquid hydrocarbon's have more energy than batteries, but there exist fuels with even higher energy density, and modes of transportation that don't require as much energy. Fossil fuel is a "local maxima" in the transportation efficiency game -- that's all.  Society will eventually move to a different optimum once some event (war, famine, pestilence..) dislodges us from the current one. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two centuries ago RPI guy Roebling pointed out that fossil fuel was a transient embarrassment of an energy solution, and whistfully noted that the Egyptians sustainably erected the pyramids with energy obtained from rice processed through Jews. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nadz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 11:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
